Greg enjoys putting down Krugman.
Blanchard on the Outlook
By Greg Mankiw
Regular readers of this blog may remember the following exchange from March:
1. I express some doubt about the administration's economic forecast because it assumes a trend-stationary processs for GDP rather than a process with a unit root.
2. Paul Krugman accuses me of "deliberate obtuseness."
3. I ask Paul to place a wager on the administration's forecast. (He never responds.)
Well, now, the IMF's Olivier Blanchard writes the following:
The historical evidence is worrisome, however. The IMF's forthcoming World Economic Outlook presents evidence from 88 banking crises over the past four decades in a wide range of countries. While there is large variation across countries, the conclusion is that, on average, output does not go back to its old trend path, but remains permanently below it. The possible good news is that the trend itself appears to be unaffected: on average, crises permanently decrease the level of output, but not its growth rate. So, if past is prologue, the world economy likely will return to its past growth rate. But, especially in advanced countries, the period of above-average growth, characteristic of normal recoveries, may be short-lived or nonexistent.
What Olivier is saying is that the shocks to the level of GDP from banking crises are typically permanent. That is, in econometric terms, there is a unit root. Of course, Olivier could be wrong. But I am pretty sure that he is not guilty of "deliberate obtuseness."
By the way, the administration's midsession review, with its updated forecast, should be coming out soon. Will Team Obama continue to forecast a rebound to the previous trend, as they did in March, or will they change their view and take to heart the kind of evidence Olivier describes above? Either way, it will be noteworthy. |
