Our dear William Lane Craig is at it again, was just wondering when this illiterate hobgoblin was going to pen another puffed cereal diatribe, this time takes aim at a new website of the American Humanist Association promoting of all things:
“To encourage curiosity, critical thinking, and tolerance among young people, as well as to provide accurate information regarding a wide range of issues related to humanism, science, culture, and history.”
We should really concern ourselves with another website that encourages tolerance among young people & critical thinking <bg
washingtonpost.com
One would love to hear this bumblehead Craig's reply to the poster who responded to his article with:
Dr. Craig attacks humanism on the basis that it contains no “objective moral value.” It's true that humanists accept the idea that our moral and ethical values change over time. And we have both the ability and the responsibility to change them when circumstances change or when new information is brought to light that affects us and the world around us. This is not a negative. I seriously doubt that even Dr. Craig would continue to support the ideas of ancient cultures that women are to be treated as second-class citizens, witches should be burned at the stake to “save their souls,” rape victims should be forced to marry their attackers, and slavery should be seen in a positive light. The humanist point of view is one of responsibility, something which can’t be done with ancient contradictory
evol meme
|
