Paracelsian Inc (PRLN) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Paracelsian Inc (PRLN)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Rick Costantino who wrote (3249)	9/12/1997 4:04:00 PM
From: Hank	of 4342

Rick, I don't what to say now. You've laid it out in a way that I never imagined. I would have thought that Rhodes and others involved could have profited far more from PRLN stock than by sabotaging it purposely to cover huge short positions. Maybe that is what that 243K day was all about last week. Shorts covering. Perhaps it explains the volume over the last few days. I for one am more than willing to hire and retain a lawyer to pursue this matter further should the Babish/Campbell lawsuits fail. I now know what Babish meant when he told me he was ashamed to have been associated with PRLN. If I had known all these details sooner, I'd have found a way to go to that shareholder meeting and it wouldn't have been pretty. Hank

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next