Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TimF who wrote (328631)	3/12/2007 8:10:16 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (2) of 1575761

"She wasn't doing classified work," Where do you get this? She was working on the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and it certainly was classified. True, she was working out of an office, but the company was a cover. en.wikipedia.org "nor was she apparently too secretive about being a CIA employee" Yeah, Shorty makes this claim all the time. But he can't back it up from any reputable source. I doubt if you can either. "but she may have done classified work in the past" May have hell. She had NOC status. It doesn't get any more classified than that. Which renders the whole "nor was she apparently too secretive about being a CIA employee" total nonsense. And an agent who has held NOC status is going to be especially careful about public knowledge of their CIA connections. Especially in DC, once that is known, sooner or later it is going to be traced back to their activities out of country. And that endangers the people they were working with overseas. Plus any other operatives that may be there. Because anyone she came in contact with would be under a cloud of suspicion.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next