and another:
Election Fraud Continues in the US
New Data Shows Widespread Vote Manipulations in 2004
By Peter Phillips
In the fall of 2001, after an eight-month review of 175,000 Florida ballots
never counted in the 2000 election, an analysis by the National Opinion
Research Center confirmed that Al Gore actually won Florida and should have been
President. However, coverage of this report was only a small blip in the corporate
media as a much bigger story dominated the news after September 11, 2001.
New research compiled by Dr. Dennis Loo with the University of Cal Poly
Pomona now shows that extensive manipulation of non-paper-trail voting machines
occurred in several states during the 2004 election.
The facts are as follows:
In 2004 Bush far exceeded the 85% of registered Florida Republican votes that
he got in 2000, receiving more than 100% of the registered Republican votes
in 47 out of 67 Florida counties, 200% of registered Republicans in 15
counties, and over 300% of registered Republicans in 4 counties. Bush managed these
remarkable outcomes despite the fact that his share of the crossover votes by
registered Democrats in Florida did not increase over 2000, and he lost ground
among registered Independents, dropping 15 points. We also know that Bush "won"
Ohio by 51-48%, but statewide results were not matched by the
court-supervised hand count of the 147,400 absentee and provisional ballots in which Kerry
received 54.46% of the vote. In Cuyahoga County, Ohio the number of recorded
votes was more than 93,000 greater than the number of registered voters.
More importantly national exit polls showed Kerry winning in 2004. However,
It was only in precincts where there were no paper trails on the voting
machines that the exit polls ended up being different from the final count. According
to Dr. Steve Freeman, a statistician at the University of Pennsylvania, the
odds are 250 million to one that the exit polls were wrong by chance. In fact,
where the exit polls disagreed with the computerized outcomes the results
always favored Bush - another statistical impossibility. .
Dennis Loo writes, "A team at the University of California at Berkeley,
headed by sociology professor Michael Hout, found a highly suspicious pattern in
which Bush received 260,000 more votes in those Florida precincts that used
electronic voting machines than past voting patterns would indicate compared to
those precincts that used optical scan read votes where past voting patterns
held."
There is now strong statistical evidence of widespread voting machine
manipulation occurring in US elections since 2000. Coverage of the fraud has been
reported in independent media and various websites. The information is not
secret. But it certainly seems to be a taboo subject for the US corporate media.
Black Box Voting reported on March 9, 2005 that voting machines used by over
30 million voters were easily hacked by relatively unsophisticated programs
and audits of the computers would not show the changes. It is very possible that
a small team of hackers could have manipulated the 2004 and earlier elections
in various locations throughout the United States. Irregularities in the vote
counts certainly indicate that something beyond chance occurrences has been
happening in recent elections.
That a special interest group might try to cheat on an election in the United
States is nothing new. Historians tell us how local political machines from
both major parties have in the past used methods of double counting, ballot box
stuffing, poll taxes and registration manipulation to affect elections. In
the computer age, however, election fraud can occur externally without local
precinct administrators having any awareness of the manipulations - and the fraud
can be extensive enough to change the outcome of an entire national election.
There is little doubt key Democrats know that votes in 2004 and earlier
elections were stolen. The fact that few in Congress are complaining about fraud is
an indication of the totality to which both parties accept the status quo of
a money based elections system. Neither party wants to further undermine
public confidence in the American "democratic" process (over 80 millions eligible
voters refused to vote in 2004). Instead we will likely see the quiet passing
of legislation that will correct the most blatant problems. Future elections in
the US will continue as an equal opportunity for both parties to maintain a
national democratic charade in which money counts more than truth.
Peter Phillips is a Professor of Sociology at Sonoma State University and
Director of Project Censored. Dennis Loo's report "No Paper Trail Left Behind:
the Theft of the 2004 Presidential Election," can be viewed at
projectcensored.org |
