SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Brad Bolen who wrote (3296)8/27/1998 9:44:00 AM
From: Catfish   of 13994
 
McHale Assails Attack On His Military Record
Action 'Reprehensible,' Clinton Critic Says
By Howard Kurtz
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, August 27, 1998; Page A08

Rep. Paul McHale (Pa.), the only Democrat on Capitol Hill to call for President Clinton to resign, said yesterday that it was "reprehensible" for a presidential ally to leak false charges about McHale's military decorations.

"A defense of the president ought not involve character assassination," he said.

The controversy surfaced Monday when NBC's Geraldo Rivera said that he "just got a call from my source very close to President Clinton, who reminded me that there was a controversy in terms of the medals [McHale] won in the armed forces of the United States. He was indeed a, what was it, a Bronze Star winner, but maybe he claimed to something even more honorable than that."

The problem: McHale does not have a Bronze Star and never claimed to have been awarded one, or any higher military honor.

McHale said a White House official called him late yesterday to say that "the president apologized for the attack on my character" and "the president would never have approved this kind of attack. . . . I accepted the apology." Rivera has also apologized.

White House spokesman Joe Lockhart said that "anyone who questions the integrity of Congressman McHale is no friend of the president's. While we may disagree with Congressman McHale's assessment of the current situation, no one here questions his integrity. . . . The White House will not tolerate comments like these. Unfortunately, we can't control some jerks outside this building who purport to speak for the president."

Lockhart acknowledged he had no way of knowing whether the unnamed source is on the White House staff.

After learning of the charge on "Rivera Live," McHale faxed his military biography to Rivera with a letter saying that "your source at the White House obviously provided false information" and "abused your trust."

On his CNBC show Tuesday, Rivera recounted his charge that McHale had "falsely claimed to be a Medal of Honor winner," adding: "I apologize, Mr. McHale, if either my reference to the Medal of Honor or the Bronze Star was inaccurate. But in fairness to me, apparently there has been some very real controversy over your claims about your military service."

McHale is a longtime Marine who rose to the rank of major and, while in the reserves, volunteered for duty in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait during the Persian Gulf War. In 1992, when he unseated then-Rep. Don Ritter (R), veterans allied with Ritter charged that McHale had exaggerated his role in the war and was a liaison officer, not the commander of a security unit. But other Marines said he had shared leadership duties; in any event, no mention was made of medals.

In his military biography, McHale says his decorations include the Kuwait Liberation Medal, Armed Forces Reserve Medal and National Defense Service Medal.

McHale called the effort to discredit him "dishonorable," saying, "It's consistent with the pattern of personal criticism that emanates from this White House when a person, including a member of the United States Congress, voices opposition to the president. That person acted with malice. Clearly he knew what he was doing."

He was referring to past instances in which White House allies have challenged the credibility of Clinton critics, particularly independent counsel Kenneth W. Starr.

Asked if Rivera should have checked out the allegation first, CNBC spokesman George Jamison said, "The comment was clearly attributed, and in fact there was a controversy." Rivera has consistently defended Clinton and denounced Starr.

c Copyright 1998 The Washington Post Company

washingtonpost.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext