"How do you know that what the program says is compliant, really is.and vice versa. Either the tester would have to know this from previous Y2K experience, or consult other Y2K-knowledgeable sources. That's why the "qualifications" question comes up. "
ok I hear you, but here is what I am thinking, and I'm just a little guy, but if I was certain, that the program worked perfectly, and I was certain that it was a great program, then I'd be scrambling to load up on these prices..don't you think...now the fact that I don't know if the program works(not saying it doesn't) would make me cautious. So I am not scrambling at this point, still investigating.
So that's what my reaction would be, so , as a normal guy (my opinion), wouldn't the market respond the same way. If there was a statement made as to the fact that the product absolutely was great, would that not create, a buying frenzy, driving the price up.
I gathered that the whole crux to the opposition here was the hype and dump scenario, so maybe
I say maybe, the management is reluctant to release information based on past reactions from the JIMB guy, you know what I mean.
I don't think a ceo wants to see a stock chart that looks like a heart attack cardio gram either. Maybe they have just put up a huge cautionary stance on press releases.
Who knows, I'm just thinking out loud |
