SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: James Calladine11/5/2004 2:00:16 PM
  Read Replies (1) of 173976
 
THE PRIVATIZATION SHELL GAME

....It looks like Social Security privatization is now at the top of President Bush's agenda. We'll soon be flooded with lots of doubletalk about how this is going to be funded and what it means, but in the meantime here is Privatization for Dummies — a simple look at what it costs and who pays for it. Trust me on this: no matter how much they try to baffle and confuse us about their plan, this is approximately how it will work:

*

Currently, the total Social Security tax is 12.4% of income (up to a maximum of $87,000).

*

The most popular proposal is one that allows workers to shift 2 percentage points of their current Social Security contributions into private accounts.

*

In other words, for each $100 of income, you (and your employer) pay $12.40 to the government to fund Social Security. Privatization allows you to deduct $2 of this and move it into a private account. That $2 represents about 16% of your original $12.40 contribution.

*

In 2003, total net contributions to Social Security amounted to $533 billion.

*

16% of $533 billion is $85 billion. Thus, contributions to the government will fall by about $85 billion per year and be invested instead in private account.

These contributions, of course, are used to pay benefits to current Social Security recipients. No one is proposing that these benefits should be cut.

Bottom line: taxes go down by $85 billion, spending stays the same, and we add another $85 billion each year to the federal deficit. Wahoo! Who cares about deficits anyway?

UPDATE: Modified to make the math clearer, I hope. But it's correct. Honest.

washingtonmonthly.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News