SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Biotech Valuation
CRSP 57.30-0.1%2:44 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ian@SI who wrote (3379)4/9/2001 3:19:29 PM
From: Biomaven   of 52153
 
Big win for Igen today. I posted the release on the IGEN thread:

Message 15637406

As I said there, this was likely the key issue in the case. Basically, the agreement allowed Roche (originally BM) to deduct from their reported reagent revenue anything specifically allocated on the invoice to equipment rental. (They sell the razor for little and add on to the price of razorblades). However, Roche apparently didn't allocate anything but made an arbitrary deduction anyhow. (And even tried to do it retroactively).

Further, there is allegedly (although it seems more than just alleged) an admission by a Roche executive that they wouldn't mind if the royalty deduction weakened IGEN's stock price. That might well give IGEN a shot at punitive damages.

Roche cannot permit the possibility that they lose their IGEN license, so a settlement seems likely to me.

Peter
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext