THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lane3 who wrote (3370)	3/18/2002 2:26:13 PM
From: thames_sider	of 21057

Sounds sensible to me. I'd suspect the main problem would be that - as in the UK - parents who can afford it opt out of the state system, pay more to send their children to a private school (with therefore better resources and a very pre-selected background). Hence those students most likely to succeed, and parents most likely to push them (and resource the schools) have little or no interest in public schooling, and if anything an incentive to vote for lower taxes and public cuts... which is especially awkward if you also (as I do) believe that parents have the obvious desire to have the best for their children, and some right at least influence and select that...

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next