>>This coming from some one who doesn't want to talk about his relationship with Dempsey Mork, how much are you getting paid to sit on the SI threads all day bashing stocks? You have been asked that question repeatedly and seam to never answer.<<
You really shouldn't listen to Pugs and Riley, I've answered that question.. I just don't answer it everytime they try to distract from the antics of whatever company they are presently representing. I have no financial interest in any of these scams, if I could short them, I would. They are slam dunk shorts IMO.
Perhaps you and I have different definitions of hyping, you say you tell no one to buy or sell and that is your definition. My definition is posting false information designed to induce others to buy a stock based on those statements. I consider most of your posts to be pure unadulterated hype. This business about Sylver being a babe in the woods and having been duped by so many people, flies in the face of logic and also in the face of what others know of the situation.
The facts don't check out. The retail locations that don't exist, the trademarks that aren't trademarked, the tree that doesn't grow, the musical chair TA's and IR's, the delayed court orders, the delayed squeeze, Mr. Sylver's "largest company", the repackaging of stevia, the non-existent exclusive license to export.. shall I go on ? |
