International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Robert Scott who wrote (3485)	3/6/1997 4:31:00 PM
From: Richard Mazzarella	of 35569

Robert, if there is anything I am learning besides not having enough shares of the dirts is that the ores are different enough that the extraction process will very. From what I understand GPGI and USPS ores are close, CHIP, Naxos, and CNA are close, and IPM with MXAM are similar, but not quite. Out of all the dirts, MXAM has been able to prove their dirt with a standard fire assay. All the others use an extraction assay method. Someone please correct me if I am wrong, I am still learning.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next