SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bob Brinker, Jr. who wrote (3519)2/19/1998 9:46:00 PM
From: Justa Werkenstiff   of 42834
 
Bob: You attempt to distinguish physical copying of MarketTimer versus retransmission of it over the internet. You suggest the former is clearly a violation of the copyright law while the latter is not. But there is no distinction. Section 102 provides that copyright protection extends to any original work fixed in any tangible medium of expression now known or later developed if the works can be perceived, reproduced or otherwise communicated from the medium of expression. There is no difference, therefore, between a paper copy of MarketTimer and one that exists on the internet. The fact that it takes longer to infringe the copyright laws by using snail mail is of no consequence. Thus, there is no difference under the copyright law between sending out MarketTimer to my buddies via snail mail and retransmitting ("copying" pure and simple) the same MarketTimer over the internet by the forwarding mechanism. Absent a license granted by your Dad he retains reproduction rights to his newsletter even after I have it in my hands or see it in my internet mailbox. Both examples are clear violations of the copyright laws. If you believe that retransmission may not be a copyright infringement then you may be also suggesting that it is not a copyright infringement to scan a copy of MarketTimer and then distribute it over the internet, unless you see some valid legal distinction between scanning and transmission as opposed to simple retransmission of an electronic newsletter. Not only do I believe that is an incorrect statement of the law, Dad may not be a happy camper with the implications of your position <g>. I think the decision to keep MarketTimer off the internet must rest in practical considerations alone (as you have raised). The copyright stuff just mucks up your argument.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News