SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (356738)3/30/2010 11:26:04 PM
From: Alan Smithee   of 793843
 
it is critically important to distinguish whether parents would be forced to carry the coverage for their kids as opposed to the insurers can no longer prohibit them from doing so

If one's offspring are over the age of 18, I don't see how parents can be required to cover them with insurance. They're adults in the eye of the law and the parent is no longer required to support them. However, these idiots in DC seem to have no compunctions about the mandates they impose, so I would not be surprised to find that the bill somehow imposes an obligation on a parent to pay for his or her 25 year old's health insurance. We are governed by fools.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News