SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound
REFR 1.9400.0%9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Mike M who wrote (3649)9/16/1999 11:07:00 PM
From: BDR  Read Replies (1) of 10293
 
Dan at least offers some analysis to support his position. Your argument for a long position seems to consist of references to various body parts couched in highly belligerent rhetoric. What can we expect from you next, bodily functions? Comparison of penis sizes? Threats of physical violence? For one who complains about the level of discussion on this thread, you aren't doing much to elevate it with your contributions.

"...you haven't the gonads to short GUMM..."
"...you are clueless about the company."
"Hank, you haven't the gonads to short this stock...."
"You are wrong and so is your analysis. You haven't got one bit of the story straight...and you can't spell worth a hoot either."
"...I don't think you could recognize value if it bit you on the ass..."
"You make this comment as if you knew something. Nothing could be further from the truth...."
"If you shut up about GUMM, or better yet, do some due diligence and discover a significant problem then perhaps there is room for constructive dialogue or none at all. Either of which would be fine with me."

I don't imagine you got many invitations to join the Debate Society.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext