SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Sharck Soup

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sharck who started this subject10/18/2001 8:29:51 PM
From: AD   of 37746
 
Greetings: Welcome to this Friday Letter Special Edition. With all of the talk about anthrax and other bio-terrorist weapons, Gilder Biotech Report
editor Scott Gottlieb filed the following comments we thought you'd find of interest.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Dear Friday Letter Reader:

Over the last week I've been asked a lot of questions about how to
protect
against smallpox -- a threat which seems to have a growing number of
people concerned. A friend who works with the CDC says some there
believe
it may the bioterrorists' weapon du jour.

Given the lack of technical sophistication of this crowd, any smallpox
attack would likely consist of a dozen bioterrorists self-infecting and
then walking around the New York City subways. The simplicity of such an

action provides some opportunities to protect ourselves, including
making
available some powerful antivirals, many of which came about during the
AIDS crisis.

First a little background on smallpox. The virus spreads from person to
person, primarily by tiny droplets expelled from the throats of infected

persons and by direct contact. Contaminated clothing or bed linens can
also spread the virus.

Patients spread smallpox primarily to household members and friends;
large
outbreaks in schools, for example, were uncommon. This finding was
accounted for in part by the fact that transmission of smallpox virus
did
not occur until onset of a rash. By then, many patients had been
confined
to bed because of the high fever and lethargy caused by the early stages

of the illness. Secondary cases were usually restricted to those who
came
into contact with patients, usually in the household or in the hospital.

The patient was most infectious from onset of rash through the first 7
to
10 days of rash. As scabs formed, infectivity waned rapidly. Although
the
scabs contained large amounts of viable virus, laboratory studies showed

that they were not especially infectious, presumably because the virus
particles were bound tightly in the rash.

Infection starts after virus particles are implanted in the throat,
nose,
or lungs. The infectious dose is unknown but is believed to be only a
few
virus particles. After about two weeks, patients experience high fever,
malaise, headaches and backaches. Severe abdominal pain and delirium are

sometimes present. A rash that resembles chicken pox then appears in the

mouth and throat, face, and forearms, and spreads to the trunk and legs
As
patients recover, the scabs break and turn into pitted scars.

Back as late as the 1970s, when the last cases of smallpox were reported

in the Western world, there were few treatments -- other than
vaccination.
That has changed. There are at least half-dozen antivirals that are
believed to have efficacy against smallpox. Many of these can probably
be
used as post-exposure prophylaxis.

Most of the studies with these drugs have been conducted in animals and
test tubes. There are a few human trials to draw on. I will focus on two

drugs: one because it's believed to be excellent, and could be available

in the time of a crisis. The second, while not as effective, is widely
available today.

The first is Cidofovir, an antiviral agent aimed at DNA viruses,
developed
by Gilead Sciences (GILD). Cidofovir was tried against HIV, but didn't
work that well. First of all, it had to be delivered intravenously to be

effective. Also, it was toxic to the kidneys. So it was largely
abandoned.
The drug, however, is still on the market for limited use in some
complications of AIDS, and there is laboratory and clinical data that it

would be very effective against smallpox.

The other drug is Rifampin, a mainstay in the treatment of tuberculosis.

While Rifampin lacks the potency of Cidofovir, it's widely available and

could provide some measure of post-exposure prophylaxis. It works by
blocking assembly of the smallpox virus. It's easy to get, and certainly

better than nothing.

All this is not to say anyone expects an imminent attack. But even a few

cases of smallpox would be catastrophic. For all the fear over anthrax,
it's still a one-time agent. It doesn't spread from person to person. To

catch it you need to come directly in contact with the spores. And the
first thing we do in the hospital is wash down the suspected victims.

The real test for our nation will come when a communicable disease like
smallpox crops up. Even doctors are petrified of the possibility. There
have been a lot of stories about the risk of a looming attack. Let's
hope
it's just media hype.

--Scott Gottlieb, M.D.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext