SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : SYQUEST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Stephen Leung who wrote (3667)8/6/1997 12:16:00 PM
From: Cogito   of 7685
 
>>If they were damn sure of winning, why would they throw in a frivolous patent name violation like JET. Any judge could not take the entire suit seriously if Iomega threw something like this in. This only serves to undermine Iomega's case.<<

Stephen -

Well, a trademark is a trademark. I do agree that the Jet thing seems silly, but Iomega's lawyers obviously thought that it should be included in the suit.

I don't believe that the validity of the Jet claim has anything to do with how a judge will rule on the patent issues, though.

- Allen
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News