Research Frontiers (REFR) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Research Frontiers (REFR)

REFR 1.940

0.0%

9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Edscharp who wrote (3709)	4/5/2003 2:55:11 PM
From: inchingup	of 50017

Ed: Antagonism toward Dixon started out some 5+ years ago when she started printing absolute lies about the REFR stock scam to promote it. She is a very self-serving individual who has proven beyond a doubt that the word honesty is not in her vocabulary or life. She has assaulted myself and others on literally 1000's of ocassions for bringing the faults of REFR and its management to light. I not only know for a fact, but hold a document that expressly lays out how she and her group of criminal thugs have manipulated the stock through the use of multiple shred identities. Also, I have spent countless hours refuting REFRs claims and digging up the dirt on this company which has cost innocent people 100's of millions of dollars, people who actually took for face value the contents of press releases which consist of mainly misleading statements and deception with the intent of enhancing the wealth of management while screwing those who trusted in them. Harary and his like Saxe have made literally hundreds of claims or as they call them "expectations". Most of those claims/expectations were not realized. You can place money on the fact that if the books were even opened to the public you would see that many REFR licensees were "compensated" in one form or another for signing up. It seems sort of out of the ordinary for a company to receive less income in 2002 than it did in 2000 when it had no product, especially considering the fact that some of these fees were pre-paid and have little or no sales volume attached to them. As for Harary making specific claims that is BS. He refused to answer most questions posed to him in the CC regarding income. I too have seen SPD first hand and must say IMO it sucks. Others who have attended subsequent presentations or shows have said the new stuff isn't any better. REFR management has raped investors through deception and innuendo and used their contacts on the boards to continue that deception. I have always searched for the "truth" and have yet to find little, if any of that definition attached to the REFR stock scam.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next