SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Road Walker who wrote (372225)2/27/2008 9:02:17 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 1576167
 
No the Y is a loss.

If the government is trying to raise $1bil, and the costs of getting that billion to the government (compliance costs, avoidence costs, enforcement costs, perverse incentives etc.) is $.5bil than the dead weight loss of taxation is $.5bil.

The dead weight loss of the tax is still $.5 bil even if the government produces more than $1.5bil benefit from some particular bit of spending.

And of course the majority of the government's spending is transfer payments.

The biggest part of what's left is the military, which might be very important, but creates little wealth (although it can prevent the loss of wealth)

And significant parts of what's left aren't going to create more value than the private sector.

But even if you cherry pick the government spending that does produce more value (maybe an important infrastructure project) you still have the $.5 bil in dead weight loss from taxation, you just have enough benefit from that particular program to justify encouring the dead weight loss from taxation.

The positive result from that infrastructure project is real, but it only gets counted once. Its the benefit from the project it doesn't reduce its cost.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext