SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 491.12+1.7%Dec 8 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Al Bearse who wrote ()2/6/2000 4:26:00 PM
From: Bill Fischofer   of 74651
 
Upgrades are irrelevant

There seems to be a lot of consternation about W2K upgrades. The simple truth is that MSFT has no need for upgrades and in fact all upgrades are pure gravy. In eleven days W2K will be the current Windows corporate product and will be preloaded by default on all new Windows systems aimed at the corporate market. You'll have to specifically request that something else be preloaded on new systems. When Win98 became the current consumer Windows product you could still for a while request Win95. Try asking for Win95 today. For a while OEMs will still offer NT4 preloads but within six months to a year that option will be discontinued and W2K will be the only Windows OS shipping to the corporate market.

Retrofitting a new OS onto an old PC is quickly becoming the equivalent of buying a new engine for a car. It just isn't done. It's far easier and cheaper to just buy a replacement current system with the new OS preinstalled. The real economics of the so-called upgrade cycle is driven by new system purchases, not by the ever-diminishing used PC retrofit market. This is why W2K will be a huge success--it will shortly be the only game in town for the Windows market. Unless one believes that the Windows market itself is going to shrink dramatically over the next several years there is no way for W2K to not succeed.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext