SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound
REFR 1.600-8.5%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Mike M who wrote (3753)9/19/1999 3:47:00 PM
From: Mad2  Read Replies (1) of 10293
 
I do have a open mind to both sides of a arguement. As it related to pz's post (which had noting to do with GUMM) there are no two sides to that one. Pitty you if you can see any logic or reason in pz's post period.
This thread is appropiatly described in the thread header
The charming Mr. Wexler discusses his favorite grossly over/under valued stocks. We'll explore opportunities in stocks of fine pedigree that have been unfairly put in the dog house, and the nasty mongrels that deserve to be kicked to the curb.
Mike M, not a thread to discuss the potential limited upside of overvalued sucker stocks like GUMM, rather the excellent opportunities that exist by profiting on its move back to where it came from.
Come visit over here where the purpose of the thread is anything goes, wild theories and speculation on revenues, products and marketing opportunities for GUMM
Subject 30773
Even though you used foul language when posting to me (notice I didn't report you to Bob) your welcome at this thread Mike....because I have a open mind. Bring your friends. Just keep it within SI's terms of use.
BTW tell pz he's not invited.
See ya
mad2
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext