Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: i-node who wrote (376403)	4/5/2008 3:38:56 PM
From: combjelly	of 1577189

"There is no doubt that 9/11 was a direct result of Clinton's incompetence in dealing with the issue." Uh huh. Sure. It was just a coincidence that 9/11 happened after the Bush administration started to dismantle the Clinton era anti-terrorism effort and focus it on agents of rogue nations. Which was his brand new world problem. I know you would like to forget this, because in retrospect it seems just as whacked out to everyone as it seemed to those who had a clue back then, but... "but 9/11 was caused by Clinton's innumerable, repeated failures more than anything else." Right. And Bush was successful, when? Is Osama rotting in prison? No. "Had he gotten Osama -- at any one of several opportunities he passed on" Yeah. If only Berger had given the go ahead at Tanaka Farms. Oh, wait. That didn't happen, did it? "So, yeah, Clinton bears most of the responsibility, and this is the way I believe history will remember it -- Bush succeeded where Clinton failed miserably." In television, this is know as "retconning". Or "retroactive continuity". Clinton didn't succeed. But Bush hasn't either.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next