Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LindyBill who wrote (37686)	4/3/2004 5:09:01 PM
From: Dr. Voodoo	Read Replies (1) of 793935

I understand your points about some of the things that they have to say, but listen to the message the fool said. I don't have a problem if they disagree. In fact Marburgers reply was great. But pullleeaaasee!!! To suggest that scientific facts have no place shaping public policy is idiotic, stupid and dangerous. I hardly think what this guy said could be taken out of context any other way than to suggest that political agenda is just as important as scientific fact. Sounds like the days when we burned witches and books. Also if you haven't read the text of their concerns, you should. I find it pretty easy to believe that one can find 20 nobelaureates who are kooks, but in this case they have some valid points. In isolated cases, sure sure, a lot of it is easy to dismiss and should be. But in sum and total it is impossible to deny that there is a pattern of political agenda and they would rather throw away good research on things like stem cells and let other countries leap ahead of us in science because their perceived moral agenda does not agree with basic science. It's stupid stupid stupid.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next