Value Investing Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: jeffbas who wrote (3784)	4/9/1998 1:02:00 AM
From: Shane M	Read Replies (1) of 78661

Jeffrey, I agree with you that my home-brewed research has it's problems, but in general after running screens and removing the no-grow to very slow growers historical returns tend to improve in the samples I work with. Admittedly my data does have problems (AAII Stock Investor): -The database is not complete in that it only includes companies present today. Companies that have been bought-out or gone-under would not be weighted in the screen. -It is likely biased by other screening criterion I use, such as ROE requirements, debt level restrictions, market cap requirements,etc. What do you think would be a "fair" test to run to isolate value stocks with and without sales growth? I'm interested for input here, because I'm needing to develop some new screens with superior historical performance to generate some new investment ideas. Shane

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next