SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Road Walker who wrote (379033)4/18/2008 3:20:20 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 1576160
 
I bet if you asked the soldiers in Iraq if they were involved in a major military operation you would get an unqualified "YES".

I'd take that bet, but there is no way to resolve it.

In any case even if your right about that bet it doesn't mean your right about what a major military operation is. Not every soldier would have to deal with or have extensive knowledge about such a point. A better source than the common soldier would be a military historian, or an instructor at what of the war colleges.

And yes its just a semantic issue, but the initial attack on Bush because of the phrase relies on semantics. If major military operations really are over, than his statement was correct.

If this is a minor military operation

It isn't a minor operation or a major operation. Its a conflict that has had major operations (the initial invasion, maybe Fallujah) and many minor ones.

You have a war or conflict. Within the war or conflict you have operations. "Major military operations have ended", doesn't mean that the conflict has ended. Technically it isn't even a prediction that they won't start again.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext