SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Financial Collapse of 2001 Unwinding

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: elmatador who wrote (3882)11/1/2019 11:28:54 AM
From: Elroy Jetson   of 13801
 
That's the exact opposite of our experience in California.

In Los Angeles our power and water is reliably and inexpensively supplied by a city-owned utility DWP.

In many ways the history of Los Angeles is the DWP which allowed us to build a mega city in the desert.

In northern California they have a private company PG&E and even moved to a free-market purchase of electricity to make it even more 'free markety', and the result has been blackouts, chaos, poor maintenance, black-outs, explosions, and high rates. I had a job at PG&E during the summers while I went to college, and the place was as fat and happy as any monopoly could be.

It's not the outcome a political hack would have predicted. Political hacks tell us happiness lies in selling off the DWP so Los Angeles can get 'free markety' too.

No thanks.

With PG&E in bankruptcy, if people in Northern California have any sense the rate payers will buy PG&E out of bankruptcy and run it for their own benefit as we do in Los Angeles.

Homes sell for more in Los Angeles if they're in DWP territory than they do a short distance away where the electricity supplier is a private company. People vote with their feet and their Dollars.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext