SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : BNEZ Facts Thread: Ben Ezra, Weinstein and Company, Inc.
BNEZ 0.00Sep 18 5:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ellen who wrote (31)12/16/1998 5:29:00 PM
From: Ellen   of 86
 
FAHN - part 2

12/15/98: 11/06/97 NASD ARBITRATION

SUBJECT OF AN NASD ARBITRATION AWARD. THE ARBITRATION INVOLVED A PUBLIC

CUSTOMER AND WAS FILED BECAUSE OF THE FOLLOWING DISPUTE(S): UNAUTHORIZED

TRADING; ACCOUNT RELATED - FAILURE TO SUPERVISE; BRCH OF FIDUCIARY DT. THE

AWARD INCLUDED: ACTUAL/COMPENSATORY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY

CUSTOMER-$71,522.00, AMOUNT AWARDED TO CUSTOMER-$18,823.14 JOINTLY AND

SEVERALLY; ACTUAL/COMPENSATORY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00,

AMOUNT AWARDED TO CUSTOMER-$1,754.89 JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY;

ACTUAL/COMPENSATORY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00, AMOUNT AWARDED

3

TO CUSTOMER-$0.00 JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY; PUNITIVE/EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, AMOUNT

ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00, AMOUNT AWARDED TO CUSTOMER-$0.00 JOINTLY AND

SEVERALLY; ATTORNEY'S FEES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00, AMOUNT AWARDED TO

CUSTOMER-$20,000.00 JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY. [NASD ARBITRATION CASE NO.

96-02680]

12/15/98: 9/11/97 NASD ARBITRATION

SUBJECT OF AN NASD ARBITRATION AWARD. THE ARBITRATION INVOLVED A PUBLIC

CUSTOMER AND WAS FILED BECAUSE OF THE FOLLOWING DISPUTE(S): ACCOUNT

RELATED-BREACH OF CONTRACT; BRCH OF FIDUCIARY DT; ACCOUNT RELATED-NEGLIGENCE;

ACCOUNT RELATED - FAILURE TO SUPERVISE. THE AWARD INCLUDED:

ACTUAL/COMPENSATORY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$59,868.00, AMOUNT

AWARDED TO CUSTOMER-$15,000.00 JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY; PUNITIVE/EXEMPLARY

DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$100,000.00, AMOUNT AWARDED TO

CUSTOMER-$0.00 JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY; ATTORNEY'S FEES, AMOUNT ASKED BY

CUSTOMER-$0.00, AMOUNT AWARDED TO CUSTOMER-$0.00 JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY; OTHER

COSTS, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00, AMOUNT AWARDED TO CUSTOMER-$0.00

JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY; OTHER MONETARY RELIEF, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00,

AMOUNT AWARDED TO CUSTOMER-$3,750.00 JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY; TREBLE DAMAGES,

AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$119,736.00, AMOUNT AWARDED TO CUSTOMER-$0.00

JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY. [NASD ARBITRATION CASE NO. 95-03206]

12/15/98: 5/01/97 NASD CENSURE AND FINE

OFFER OF SETTLEMENT FILED APRIL 17, 1996 AND OCTOBER 26, 1996; FAHNESTOCK &

CO., INC. WAS CENSURED AND FINED $6,500 BY THE NASD FOR VIOLATION OF NASD

CONDUCT RULE 2110 AND MARKETPLACE RULE 4730(B)5 OF THE RULES OF THE

ASSOCIATION. [NASD COMPLAINT NO. UNSPECIFIED]

12/15/98: 4/27/97 NASD FINE

ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT; FAHNESTOCK & CO., INC. WAS FINED $2,000.00 BY

THE NASD. THE AWC ALLEGES THAT FAHNESTOCK VIOLATED MARKETPLACE RULE 4613E FOR

ENTERING OR MAINTAINING QUOTATIONS IN THE NASDAQ STOCK MARKET, DURING NORMAL

BUSINESS HOURS, WHICH CAUSED A LOCKED MARKET CONDITION TO OCCUR IN THREE

SECURITIES. [NASD COMPLAINT NO. CMS960202 AWC]

12/15/98: 4/23/97 NASD FINE

ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT; FAHNESTOCK WAS FINED $10,000.00 BY THE NASD.

4

THE AWC ALLEGES THAT FAHNESTOCK VIOLATED SEC RULE 17A-3 AND NASD CONDUCT RULE

3010. FAHNESTOCK RECORDED AN INACCURATE EXECUTION TIME ON ORDER TICKETS FOR

215 TRANSACTIONS AND FAILED TO CREATE RECORDS SHOWING THE ENTRY OF TWO ORDERS.

IN ADDITION, FAHNESTOCK FAILED TO ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN WRITTEN SUPERVISORY

PROCEDURES DESIGNED TO DETECT AND DETER TRADE REPORTING FUNCTIONS. [NASD

COMPLAINT NO. CMS960226 AWC]

12/15/98: 12/30/96 NASD ARBITRATION

SUBJECT OF AN NASD ARBITRATION AWARD. THE ARBITRATION INVOLVED A PUBLIC

CUSTOMER AND WAS FILED BECAUSE OF THE FOLLOWING DISPUTE(S): UNAUTHORIZED

TRADING; EXECUTIONS-FAILURE TO EXECUTE; MISREPRESENTATION; SUITABILITY. THE

AWARD INCLUDED: ACTUAL/COMPENSATORY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY

CUSTOMER-$18,123.11, AMOUNT AWARDED TO CUSTOMER-$2,000.00; INTEREST, AMOUNT

ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00, AMOUNT AWARDED TO CUSTOMER-$0.00 JOINTLY AND

SEVERALLY. [NASD ARBITRATION CASE NO. 96-05716]

12/15/98: 10/11/96 NASD ARBITRATION

SUBJECT OF AN NASD ARBITRATION. THE ARBITRATION INVOLVED A PUBLIC CUSTOMER

AND WAS FILED BECAUSE OF THE FOLLOWING DISPUTE(S): MANIPULATION; SUITABILITY;

UNAUTHORIZED TRADING; ACCOUNT RELATED - FAILURE TO SUPERVISE. THE AWARD

INCLUDED: ACTUAL/COMPENSATORY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY

CUSTOMER-$5,000,000.00; INTEREST, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; ATTORNEY'S

FEES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; OTHER COSTS, AMOUNT ASKED BY

CUSTOMER-$0.00; OTHER MONETARY RELIEF, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00;

PUNITIVE/EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$10,000,000.00;

ACTUAL/COMPENSATORY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$7,500,000.00;

INTEREST, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; ACTUAL/COMPENSATORY DAMAGES, AMOUNT

ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; ATTORNEY'S FEES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00;

PUNITIVE/EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$10,000,000.00; OTHER

COSTS, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; OTHER MONETARY RELIEF, AMOUNT ASKED BY

CUSTOMER-$0.00. RELIEF REQUESTS HAVE BEEN DENIED IN FULL. [NASD ARBITRATION

CASE NO. 95-01176]
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext