SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor
GDXJ 117.34+3.7%Jan 5 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: long-gone who wrote (39446)8/23/1999 10:12:00 AM
From: Claude Cormier  Read Replies (1) of 116842
 
<<As this "production" has near no cost (or even a negative cost), is there any impact? >>

I doubt it very much... IMO, we are talking here of very small numbers from this source.

A gold mine that is set to produce 25,000 ounces a year is very noticeable with large buildings, crushers, leach pads..or whatever..
I doubt you see many of these in the states you mentioned. Even if you saw 100 hundreds of similar operations.. you would still get a production of only 75-80 tons... which is pale when compared to the 1000+ tons of scrap last year.

And if those 100 operations did really exists... they would likely be included in the official production figures.

Artisanal production does exists and there may be more several dozens similar operations... but annual production per operation is probably only a few thousand ounces per year.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext