SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Estate Planning

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: SI Dave who wrote (2)1/15/2005 12:38:54 AM
From: Cisco   of 79
 
I read on another thread the other day your discussion on how Suze Orman sometimes makes blanket statements, which are not always true. Well I ran across another one of these in her book which is more often wrong than right.

She states that all revocable living trusts should be coupled with a pour over will. The fact is only a living trust with subtrust for property management should have a pour over will. Instead, other trust should have a regular back up will.

One of the advantages of a living trust is that it can be settled and closed in a few weeks after death instead of taking months to years for a will to be probated. If you have a pour over clause in your will then your trust must remain open until after the will is probated and everything has been poured over into your trust. If you have a subtrust in your living trust for your children, then a pour over will may be okay since there is no hurry to close the trust.

In my case, I plan to put everything into my trust except my car, bank accounts, and brokerage accounts. I will have a TOD on each of my bank account and brokerage accounts so that the only property I will have going through my will is my car. I will have a pour over clause in my will as well since I have children who will have subtrusts set up for them.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext