SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: MKTBUZZ who started this subject5/6/2003 7:01:16 AM
From: Raymond Duray   of 769670
 
Bush to Cash Strapped States: "Screw You!"

washingtonpost.com

Rescue's Just Not Part of the Plan

NEW YORK -- For anyone who came of age here in the 1970s, the moment endures as part of a primal political narrative. Its coffers busted, New York City leaders carried a beggar's cup to the nation's capital in hopes of securing a $2 billion loan guarantee. President Gerald Ford listened, and offered nothing.

The Daily News headline the next day had the aphoristic brevity of graffiti: "FORD TO CITY: DROP DEAD."

Soon a financial control board became the city's czar, and it laid off tens of thousands of workers. New York's current police commissioner, Ray Kelly, recalls watching dozens of officers, one after another, walk into his precinct house and hand in their badges and guns.

Now the Bush administration seems intent on trumping Ford, on a national rather than regional scale. White House officials could glance last week at a potholed national terrain, with more than half of the states bracing for staggering deficits this year and next. California faces a $34 billion hole, New York's is $12 billion and President Bush's home state of Texas anticipates a $9.9 billion shortfall through 2005.

But rather than the sort of rescue package much wished for by the states, the administration is suggesting additional responsibilities. It proposes to replace the $13 billion Section 8 housing voucher program -- the country's main form of housing assistance for the poor -- with one that the states would run. The federal government would provide a lump sum payment to the states each year, but it has offered no assurances that enough federal funding will follow to keep the program whole. Federal officials already whisper their hope that hard-pressed state officials might prune back this "entitlement" program in the future.

<Continues........>
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext