"As both parts of that message were so completely out
of the context of my original post and even your
diatribes, why would I continue to follow along? "
Diatribes? Ahem..... Look in a mirror. I was responding to
a diatribe of revisionist history, providing evidence to
establish that my reply was more than just a biased POV.
Well, in any event, my reply was in direct response to
your, "conservatives, who play the blame game as well
as any, greeted the tragedy with such a cacophony of
Clinton bashing", assertion. As anyone can see, all of
my links were completely in context, establishing that
LWE's seemed to be the folks mouthing off more than those
on the right. Had you bothered to read my reply & review
just a handful of the links, you would have seen that to
be true too.
However, I've followed your postings enough to understand
that you are inflexibly biased. That would explain why you
chose to only look at one of the 57 links, then promptly
dismiss the whole lot. You knew that the odds were that
those links would run completely contrary to your
unyielding POV. Feel free to continue to dismiss them
without any review whatsoever. I'm satisfied they
established my point quite well.
And it's obvious from each of your weak, unsupportable &
history altering replies that no amount of facts are going
to change your mind, so this will be my last reply on this
subject. |
