SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Ultra Petroleum (UPL)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Richard L. Miller who wrote (4078)4/27/1999 4:37:00 PM
From: Gerald Atwater  Read Replies (1) of 4851
 
Richard --

The March 26-April 1, l999, issue of the Rocky Mountain Oil Journal reported the following: During November of l998, 75 Jonah wells produced 4.544 Bcfg. That works out to about 2,019,000 cubic feet/day per well. Is that fairly consistent with what other off-Jonah wells are producing for UP? ( Frankly, I had thought actual gas production flows were MUCH higher than that.)

If the first year decline is 66%,
another 50% decline by the end of Year 3,
and about 6% decline each additional year for a total of 20 years,
WHAT is the total gas production for that well over 20 years?
(The decline rates are from Ultra's June, l998, Brochure.)

On the revenue side:
If the price per 1000 cubic feet of gas is U.S.$1.60 for Year 1,
and the price increases at 3% a year for 20 years,
WHAT is the total value of the produced gas over 20 years?

Do you or anyone else have the means to answer those questions?
Because that is what the cost of the well is "charged" against. After payoff apparently there are only small individual well expenses.

Richard, your friend's well at $1,500,000 to complete is the figure I've read used for a Schlumberger well using 3 1/2' pipe. A Halliburton well apparently cost about a million more because of larger diameter pipe and different fracing technique and additional time. And all those sky-high Initial Production numbers we've all seen don't seem to matter at all when actual production is about 2MMcfd. (Or do they indicate wells with increased years of productivity because pressure is conserved?)

Anyone who could put out some solid numbers would be appreciated by all!

Gerry Atwater
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext