Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: kash johal who wrote (41280)	11/11/1998 9:01:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	of 1582604

<This is one of the most one sided articles I have ever read. Could have been written by some of the Intellafoons.> Yeah, you could argue that, but remember, the PC Magazine article was talking about professional and corporate PC's, which isn't AMD's focus as of now. Also, all the computers in the reviews that featured AMD processors were made by makers whom I've hardly ever heard of. The only name that I recognized out of the AMD computers was Unicent. None of the big names like Compaq, HP, or IBM had any AMD models in the PC Magazine review. That's one explanation of AMD's poor reviews in this article. <What's your guess on action tomorrow. Profit taking or new highs for Intel and short term highs dor AMD/NSM. The new SIA forecast is very bullish so we could have another great day tomorrow.> There's always going to be some profit-taking, but we could see higher support levels for Intel and AMD. (I don't follow NSM.) However, I don't think Intel is going to extend further beyond the highs it already achieved today. However, AMD might go even higher in the next two weeks, barring any outside influences like those pesky analysts. Tenchusatsu

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next