Cindy, Your opinion runs very close to my own.
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion; and just because that it may contain errors and mistakes and may not be according to their own contention, that is no excuse for bashing them! Of course, they too have a right to rebut it. But to question one's character in doing so is another thing! I think all three of these folks are of sound character. I know that two of them are above reproach and I suspect that S Martin is, also. It is possible that someone may have lost a lot of money on ADVR and/or have a big paper loss. Who knows for sure?
If one doesn't agree with a person's opinion, respect their right to say it, but ignore it. That's right, ignore it! Plain and simple----ignore it! Bickering back and forth solves absolutely nothing. Yes, just more controversy---but if that is how they do "their thing"--then I guess they have a right to do it; except no one has a right to question one's characher without absolute positive proof. If proof, of dishonesty, is available then there are ways and means to rectify the situation off the board. If anyone has positive proof of dishonesty, then I would be interested in having the case reviewed by a close friend and associate, who is a well known New York attorney.
Peace be unto all of you.....I believe the sun will soon shine again on all of us!
Many thanks---I am a paid subscriber to SI and I, most certainly, expect to get my money's worth!!!!!
Take care and many thanks,
Lost John
formerly "OLD JAKE" |
