Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM)

MDMN 0.000001000

-99.0%

Jun 3 1:07 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Stymie who wrote (4135)	7/13/1998 2:21:00 PM
From: EtTuBrute	of 25548

Maybe DAY put the spin on the court orders?? You seem to already be damning MDIN, when you have not even heard their side. We shall see. I knew that DAY had certain surface rights to certain of the properties, regarding the 50 million pesos pay off. I find it interesting that DAY states: "DAY confirms that it holds title and surface rights to all land which cover its published reserves, resources and mine plan." Hmmmmm, what about mineral rights???? Im also confused about this easement issue. I thought that an easement gave an entity the right to access the land, like a utility easement or a gas company easement, but not the right to possess the land or demolition property existing on the land, but then again, I dont know Chilean law. Maybe MDIN can amswer this???

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next