SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Road Walker who wrote (413914)9/5/2008 9:41:21 AM
From: Joe NYC1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) of 1576163
 
John,

They did lose some reputation and respect... but Iraq made them stronger overall. And it also changed the ME political balance, not for the better. As you say "at enormous cost to the US".

It made AQ stronger only temporarily. When Zarqawi temporarily became (more or less) the leader of the opposition to the US invasion. But currently? Not at all.

As far as ME political balance, I look at it as Maliki vs. Saddam. A democratically elected leader of the US favorable to the US vs. a murderous tyrant who paid cash for terrorist attacks. While I am not too crazy about the way we got from there to where we are now, I see an enormous improvement. But again, at enormous cost to the US.

Bottom line is that Americans have always had more to fear from each other than from AQ. We do more damage to each other every week than AQ did with their one successful strike.

When you try to minimize the risk of violent islam, you completely lose me. Violent Islam has been the biggest threat to the world for almost 1500 years. And it will continue to be so.

Joe
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext