[somewhat OT-pointing to stay OT]Hello Mr. Yoest:
Please calm down. I am interested in assessments, opinions, data, and such. Your outbursts are unwarranted. I respect Mr. Wexler's opinions--he is a man worth consideration. He is opinionated, but I have found basis underlying his opinions. He adds color to the colorful world of finance--and the related investments. I am losing patience with your style, Mr. Yoest, and ask you to produce fruit worthy of consideration.
My exasperation with your posts is getting to the point as I did with the Zitel thread of skipping over certain individuals. If I had not been preoccupied with computer access problems today, I would likely have shorted VLNC today. I appreciate Mr. Wexler's views on VLNC.
I see nothing distinguished in VLNC's efforts except they seem to be exceptionally public with blaming longstanding lack of performance on things, not accounting for it as management. That is a sufficient warning sign, coupled with undercapitalization in a multi-competitor international market populated with leading products that signals technologically they are behind the power curve and would be expected to fall further behind without a decisive and unique breakthrough. Those occur about once every ten years. Odds are that VLNC is not that gambit... Their management's statements confess they are not dignified to the extent of the major corporations that sell lithium ion batteries at this time. IMO, this reflects another aspect to VLNC management that takes them out of the competition. Top management has an appropriate style--that seems to be lacking in what I see with VLNC.
When you go out of your way to offend others I respect such as Mr. Wexler, I feel offended, too. Please apologize and let's get on to substance, not innuendo.
Regards,
m |
