<Irrelevant. We're only talking about your postings here.>
It's not irrelevant because this is the only thread where Bill normally posts. If he moved his bashings outside this thread, then you wouldn't be reading my responses here.
<In fact the post you were attacking wasn't even about GUMM>
Yes, this is precisely my point. If his post wasn't about GUMM, why did he feel compelled to get a jab in?
<That kind of kills your average.>
What does an average have to do with the price of nicotine gum in Japan?
<Maybe you could be proactive and break the cycle yourself?>
Sure, if I thought that would work. Wexler has already demonstrated that he won't stop his idiotic daily bashing of GUMM whether I post here or not.
<Bill starts with only a fraction of his intended final position, and what do you do, you turn right around and assume Bill started with a 100% position!>
I didn't assume anything. I posted a calculation on this thread a few weeks ago to make sure that I understood how much his position had increased. Bill replied that I calculated it correctly. The size of his short position in GUMM has tripled since September 4 when he said he initiated it.
<Bill is down in relatively few positions. He's way up on ERTH, GBUR, BTX, COST, THQI, and even a little up on AOL, and that's not even close to a complete list.>
You failed to mention that he's down on DELL and COVD and lost 25% in AAPL. It's very difficult to see the total effect of these positions on his overall portfolio because he doesn't post the size of his positions, specific entry prices, and exit prices. If he was really being honest with everyone here, he would create a portfolio like we have on the ZPortfolio thread so nothing is hidden. That way, one could also see if he has enough money for the complete list. This doesn't even have to be real dollars. We began the year with a fictitious $500,000 in the Zportfolio.
<Seriously, I can't suggest strongly enough that you put this thread behind you and move on.>
I'd love to, but the choice isn't mine. It's up to Wexler to stop falsely accusing GumTech of fraud. It is wrong to falsely accuse someone of a crime that they haven't committed and you and others are wrong for condoning it.
<If Zicam goes on to be heralded as the product that brought legitimacy to homeopathic remedies in the eyes of the mainstream, and GUMM goes to 50 and 100 like you are so sure it will, then you can come back here and let us all have it.>
Nope, I have more class than that. I'll leave the "I told you so" up to Wexler if things don't work out. He has already shown that he has no class by posting comments similar to this in other stocks. |
