Value Investing Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Paul Senior who wrote (4204)	5/31/1998 12:39:00 PM
From: Allen Furlan	of 78670

Re ASFN exchange2000.com I have seen references to ASFN in the Washington Post several times in the past 3-4 years and have not investigated thoroughly as of yet. Shane Milburn's posting joggled my recollection. The dissident shareholder story appeared perhaps one month ago. The story was that the new board members reversed their pre vote course, and decided that the president could stay since the companies woes were not his fault and that his performance was adequate. The stories that preceded that stated that the contesting shareholders believed that the board was controlled by family interests including the president (and I believe his father??)and the family was receiving unacceptible levels of compensation relative to poor financial performance. Can't remember whether full board or partial board was replaced. Probably easiest way to find out is to call the company.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next