You're just the guy to lecture on "intellectual dishonesty", my little editor in chief. As in your preposterous reconstruction of your version of the Bush dialogue. Here's your "intellectually honest" side of that conversation again, Billy Boy. Note the seven mentions of Bush. In this case, unlike others, you didn't get to edit in your sacred "President" qualifier after the fact.
While you're busy pontificating on the conflicts in your troubled life, how about an answer to my question.
Where and when did George Bush lie under oath? (Remember that hateful wild ranting accusatory post of yours?) Just wondering.
Look, I'm not your shrink. Go rant to someone else.
Just tell me when and where George Bush lied under oath, as you have alleged.
So, you admit that you invented that stuff about Bush lying under oath. Is that what you're telling me? Are you telling this thread that you are a liar? Or are you telling this thread that you are ignorant?
Nice tone. Again, take that to your shrink.
What's this "I'll get back to you" stuff? You made a declarative statement and now you have to go back and look it up? Why don't you tell us what you meant by your statement that Bush lied under oath? Was it your lie or your ignorance that produced that bit of mythology?
A person with integrity would have admitted he made up the statement, "and George Bush lied under oath."
And an apology for being so blindly partisan that you lied to make a point would be in order.
But liars beget liars, I guess. And people with no integrity are respected by the same. That explains your hateful existence.
Have you no shame? Cease with the endless drivel and equivocating.
You have been proven beyond a reasonable doubt to have lied when you said: "and Bush lied under oath." You can't even point to an instance where Bush was PUT UNDER OATH!
Case closed.
You lied. Admit it.
Where is your integrity?
And you complain about people attacking you? Who said this?
You did. You're a real piece of work, liar.
You lied about Bush lying under oath. You have no shame or integrity to admit it. And thank you for the "apology".
Seven mentions of Bush, and not a single mention of "President" Bush. And then the lecture on "intellectual dishonesty". Of course, in the immutable context of the mind of Billy Boy, "As President" was implicit in all those 7 mentions. As you were careful to edit in the last time I cared to address your preposterous protestations of intellectual integrity.
As for the fool part, I must again repeat your private admonition to me.
Direct name calling is not allowed. Please be creative, as I have been with you.
Yes, you're just so very creative in your self-evident intellectual honesty, Billy Boy. Just like all your "reasonable" pus pot fellow travelers here. Enjoy your hateful life as ever, Billy Boy.
|
