Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Alan Smithee who wrote (421013)	4/10/2011 9:46:38 AM
From: Katelew	Read Replies (1) of 793928

The feds have no interest here and should keep out of it. I read your link. It explained that in spite of URESA, actual collection or enforcement was still complicated and problematic. Some examples were given. Making it easier for women to collect child support was part of the comprehensive welfare reform package hammered out between Clinton and Gingrich in 1996. The link explains the whole bill. In your opinion, was PRWORA a mistake? Should the fed. govt. not have involved itself in welfare reform, leaving it to the states to decide how much reform to enact, if any? Or should only the enhancement of child support collection been carved out and left to the states? I rather like the intent of the bill, which was to reduce amount of welfare previously given but cushion the blow by cracking down on negligent fathers. Shifting responsibility onto individuals and off the govt. is something I can always get behind. Maybe enhancing child support collection was even a Republican initiative and didn't originate with Clinton at all. en.wikipedia.org

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next