You're going to have to do better than that....can't you read? That article was written by a blogger not one of the main contributors....as long as you picked this one though, you're going to have to show me where the lies are cause it reads pretty tame to me:
Posted by Steve on Wednesday, August 27, 2008 1:59:55 PM
Last night on my way home from work, I listened to Mark Levin. He was talking about Michelle Obama’s speech to the Democrat convention and where the talk came from.
In her speech, Michelle Obama said that a quote from Barack Obama struck a chord within her. The quote had to do with things as they are and things as they could be. It turns out that the quote comes from a book written by Saul Alinsky called, “Rules for Radicals”. Saul Alinsky was a communist activist in the 1940’s and 1950’s in Chicago. He tried to overthrow the US government. Obviously, he failed to complete his task. But in his efforts, he came up with some rules to help those that follow him succeed where he failed. Those rules he put in the book, “Rules for Radicals”.
If you read “Rules for Radicals” and come to chapter two, you will find a template for Michelle Obama’s speech. Her speech is not word for word from chapter two, but the ideas in chapter permeate her speech. Much of the soaring language in her speech was used in chapter two of the book.
That would tell me that Michelle Obama did not hear the words from Barack Obama or at least the words did not originate with Barack Obama. Michelle may not know that her talk was basically chapter two of “Rules for Radicals”. She may really believe that she is just repeating what Barack had told her in speeches. But, Barack has to know that the ideas in Michelle’s speech did not originate with him. It is convenient for him not to tell where the ideas originated. If he told the world where the ideas came from, he would never be elected to anything. He has to try to palm off the ideas as his own, but anyone that has read extensively would know where they really originated.
I must give complete credit for this insight to Mark Levin. There is also an article in World Net Daily at worldnetdaily.com that also talks about this connection. It has been noticed by some people. The information will spread. People like me will spread this information and everyone will eventually know where the talk came from.
Further insight into Saul Alinsky is that many Democrats subscribe to his plans as outlined in “Rules for Radicals”. Mrs. Clinton has also used tactics and rhetoric that is contained in the book. Many other leading Democrat Party politicians are currently using the plans. If the plans are carried out completely, they would result in a Soviet Communist like state in the United States. I am not calling Mrs. Clinton or any other Democrat a communist. I am just saying that Saul Alinsky was a communist. His plans were for an eventual Soviet style communist state in the US. Many leading Democrats are using his words and tactics to gain power. It is not a stretch to reach the conclusion that their goal has to be a communist state. That may or may not be their goal; I am not privy to their innermost thoughts. I am just adding up two and two and reaching a logical conclusion. The conclusion may not be correct, but with all the information currently available, it is the only conclusion that I can draw.
If you look at the plans that Barack Obama has once he takes power, you can see the goal is to create a socialist state. The difference between a socialist state and a soviet state is very slim. The only difference is that we select leaders in a socialist state and in a soviet state we do not select the leaders. The effect on the population is generally the same, grinding poverty and unemployment.
reviesramblings.blogtownhall.com |
