SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Joe NYC who wrote (4235)2/4/2008 1:32:21 PM
From: Road Walker   of 42652
 
Before I explain why, let me just state my opinion that overwhelming majority of drugs prescribed don't help and in fact do more harm than good. Based on this opinion, I think that the less drugs prescribed the better.

I wouldn't agree with the % but I do agree that there are a lot of drugs that are more harmful than helpful out there. Anecdote: a friends wife was a pharmaceutical rep. I can't remember the name of the drug... but you may as it was heavily advertised. It was supposed to cure a fungus under your toenails... purely cosmetic as this fungus, however disgusting, wasn't harmful. In her training she learned that this stuff was very dangerous to the liver in many, many people. She refused to promote it, but never told anyone or she would have been fired.

As I said, above is just a "no FDA" hypothesis. With FDA in place, I would make it a more difficult to approve new drugs, so that there are fewer disasters like we have had recently.


There was a very good article in the New Yorker a few weeks ago about the protocols of drug testing. You might be surprised how shoddy it is. I would have posted the article here but it wasn't available on line (I get the hard copy). If you come across it it's worth the time to read.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext