SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials
AMAT 322.73+6.1%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (42523)2/22/2001 5:08:37 PM
From: Fred Levine  Read Replies (1) of 70976
 
Jacob-- Years ago, I had dinner with an economist who's doctoral dissertation was on the impact of a 100% inheritance tax. Contrary to some of the posts, the impact was to stimulate the economy. !) The very rich would be forced to distribute their money to people who have lower marginal propensity-to-save curves--usually the heirs, which is a stimulus, 2) or give it away to charities or whatever, which again become more of an economic stimulus, or 3) pay it all in taxes--which obviously has a positive effect.

Now, for personal reasons there is legitimate dispute about what we own. However, the current exemption of $1.2 million seems fair to me. I can't help but read those wanting to raise it to $5 million, as they own $4.5 million.

However, the economic impact of the 100% inheritance tax is a stimulus. I, personally, would rather see 100% than zero inheritance tax to maintain the meritocracy. I do, however, prefer the current exception.

fred
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext