SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Policy Discussion Thread
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: zonder who wrote (4228)2/17/2003 11:23:58 AM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) of 15987
 
Your post is well done. However the argument you present about 11 years does nothing to discredit the accuracy of the report. Only if you can show how today is any different than 11 years ago can you start to attempt to discredit the report.

If nothing has changed then indeed, the report is current and accurate. In the light of all the other current data presented concerning the obvious missing WMD materials and contemporary actions of Iraq in hiding WMD, I see no reason or facts to suggest that that report is not current and accurate. It was an analysis of facts and the facts have not really changed. More precisely, and analysis of present day information would suggest nothing different than analysis of information 11 years ago.

The student took available data and used a reasonable perspective to interpret and present conclusions. It seem the logic of 11 years ago fits today's information very well. And it leads to the same conclusions.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News