SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 39.50-3.1%Dec 11 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Barry A. Watzman who wrote (42609)12/18/1997 11:15:00 AM
From: John F. Dowd  Read Replies (1) of 186894
 
Dear Barry:

As an intelligent person you don't understand this because the case vs. MSFT is not being brought by intelligent people but rather by political hacks. What MSFT said in their heavy handed letter was that CPQ could not remove the Exploreer when they placed alt. NSCP on the desktop. It is just like when you buy a computer and alter the mother board - in many cases that voids the contract of warranty. In this case what CPQ was doing was a breach of the contract w/ MSFT. A contract that they had entered into with their eyes wide open. I will grant you as I have above that the letter from MSFT to CPQ was heavy handed and could have been writte with a more delicate and instructive touch but it was not incorrect from a point of contractual obligations on the part of both parties. For furrther erudition I refer the following as a great exposition of the entire matter.
microsoft.com

JF DOwd
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext