Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 50.59

+4.9%

Feb 6 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Adrian Wu who wrote (4224)	10/15/1996 8:38:00 PM
From: Barry Grossman	of 186894

Thank you for your research on Prop 211 and your very informative post. The only thing I still wonder about is how the proposition is actually worded. Have you seen a copy of it yet? I haven't. The only word I'm aware of on its passability potential is from media commentators who have said they don't think it will pass. Not sure where they get their data. Re Intel: Can anybody summarize the arguments against owning the warrants rather than the stock if you believe that the stock between now and 3/98 will do every bit what it did in the last 1.5 years? Also - For John Hull: Why did Intel issue warrants? Why warrants? What did Intel get for selling them? Is the dilution of the stock because of these warrants factored into the current eps calculations? How many warrants are outstanding?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next