SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : AMLN (DIABETES DRUGS)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Henry Niman who wrote (438)8/17/1997 10:23:00 PM
From: David Bogdanoff   of 2173
 
I have been reading this thread today with some interest as I expressed my doubts as to the positive nature of the company press release and cautioned that it be read with caution because announcements from an interested party can be assummed to be biased. Since appeals to authority (credentials) have become part of the discussion, I guess I should state that I have 20 years experience in pharmaceutical company clinical trials. Therefore, I do not see the
company announcement as anything for long investors to be pleased about. If they are pleased, then they haven't learned to read between the lines of the announcement. The announcement admitted that they had difficulty in separating the effects of drug therapy from other factors, such as variable insulin usage. They also admitted that their initial indication didn't pass statistical significance and they
were forced to look at subgroups; this does represent a delay due to the failure of the initial study for the type 2 diabetes population. From what was stated in the news release, it appears that the study design was sub-optimal; this is hard to understand as these patients, their dosing patterns, and problems have been studied for a long time and are well understood. In order for an announcement to be impressive, it should contain words like "dramatic effect" and "completely lacking in toxicity". It would help if the public were pressuring their congressman and the FDA to make the drug available. This announcement did not have anything like that.

In short, Henry, I think your comments are right on the mark (and are certainly not negative hype) and I think the participants of this thread are obliged to you for sharing your expertise.

David
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext