SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : TA-Quotes Plus

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: ftth who wrote (4395)6/14/1998 4:58:00 PM
From: Spots   of 11149
 
Two separate IDE drives should help considerably because of
access arm movements regardless of drives (assuming nothing
else is beating up the disks at the time, in which case
nothing's going to help much).

If they are on different controllers, another increment.

If they are Ultra SCSI or capable of PIO mode <something
or other, I think 3 or higher>, and the controller
supports PCI bus mastering DMA, that should help consdiderably
even if they are on the same controller, and even more on
different controllers.

Finally, if they are on a caching IDE controller, another
big increment is possible.

Some of the later IDE solutions could probably beat earlier
SCSI ones, though at the same level of technology (i.e.,
age <G>) SCSI should be better.

Price performance, now, that's another question <G>.

Spots
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext