Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 153.03

-1.0%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: kyungha who wrote (44034)	1/6/2005 4:16:18 AM
From: Maurice Winn	of 197398

Bill, EricL has always taken the most negative position on Mighty Q and Dr J, but usually with some reasoning. I quite like that, because I need the best critics I can get to look out for faults. If the worst EricL can come up with is a couple of months late for some MSMs and a faulty guess on the viability of EDGE [yet to be confirmed as faulty as the bleeding EDGE is still in the introductory phase], then I'm not too worried. I don't recall Dr J having anything negative to say about WiFi, though it might be that like Andrew Seybold, he has expressed the opinion that good business cases for WiFi zones are thin on the ground, or even hot-spot networks. If I'd had better critics of Globalstar, maybe I'd have been saved from a major loss. Nearly all critics were outright wrong or completely lacking in reasoned foundations for their criticisms. Geoff Goodfellow, PCStel and maybe a couple of others were the only ones who had a clue. Tero didn't really offer much other than "Die Evil Scum!" [we all knew the handsets weren't exactly pocket-sized so that wasn't exactly a revelation. Mqurice

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next